B****y consultants!
Hi Dave
Sorry I've taken so ling to come back to you - only found your post this morning.
You and Prof. Stradling are far, far from alone in disliking the DVLA. Behaving in a way that is informed by that dislike is, in my opinion, a waste of energy. The DVLA just is! and it's up to us to make sure we know how best to interact with 'it' - the people who work there. They are constrained by a set of rules, practices and procedures. We have to abide by them. Not quite 'end of' - rules are for fools and the guidance of wise men, after all.
Sleep Clinic Staff, Professors and Consultants included, have caused endless pain for many of our members (which, no doubt, can be multiplied up for the general population) by giving mis-information about infoming DVLA. We will never get these medics to stick to talking about that which they know and handing us leaflets about DVLA. What we can do, is inform ourselves about DVLA and ignore medical advice on the subject.
You do not need to lose your (car) driving license because of OSA if you act swiftly and correctly. Many of our members can attest to this.
There is a thread here about being sacked because of OSA -it constitutes unfair dismissal because OSAis a treatable condition.
I agree with you when you say, "I understand completely the need to safeguard our roads - of course I do. We do not need drivers who fall asleep at the wheel."
Whether or not The Powers That Be "need to understand" anything about our lives is a debatabale point - the next set are in power and a few OSA sufferers added to the 2.51 million on Job Seekers might not be high on their agenda.
The family of the guy run down by a sleeping OSA driver might well argue that the DVLA rules need to be much tougher.
I contend that "feeling upset" with the DVLA and expressing those feelings is a very different kettle of fish to your comments on 6th May. I am filled with dread every time I am about to engage with a bureaucracy but find that speaking pleasantly and courteously, listening carefully, asking for help, advice and guidance, thanking them for their time and attention, spending a little time enquiring about their day, eases my way through the minefield. I never engage without a detailed map in front of me, though.
Dave, I'm really enjoying your company! What better beginning than a difference of opinion, rationally discussed? May the gods forbid that we all see the world from the same perspective!
Drewsnoresnomore, I'm so sorry you've fallen foul of sleep clinic instructions about DVLA.
Rule 1. Ignore sleep clinic advice about DVLA
Rule 2. NEVER tell DVLA that you have OSA until you have a confirmed, in writing, diagnosis. At that point, ask DVLA to send you the medical reporting forms. That is the start gun for a race to get onto CPAP treatment so you can honestly say you are being successfully treated when you return the forms.
There is endless info about OSA and DVLA in this forum.
TF
Hi Dave
Sorry I've taken so ling to come back to you - only found your post this morning.
You and Prof. Stradling are far, far from alone in disliking the DVLA. Behaving in a way that is informed by that dislike is, in my opinion, a waste of energy. The DVLA just is! and it's up to us to make sure we know how best to interact with 'it' - the people who work there. They are constrained by a set of rules, practices and procedures. We have to abide by them. Not quite 'end of' - rules are for fools and the guidance of wise men, after all.
Sleep Clinic Staff, Professors and Consultants included, have caused endless pain for many of our members (which, no doubt, can be multiplied up for the general population) by giving mis-information about infoming DVLA. We will never get these medics to stick to talking about that which they know and handing us leaflets about DVLA. What we can do, is inform ourselves about DVLA and ignore medical advice on the subject.
You do not need to lose your (car) driving license because of OSA if you act swiftly and correctly. Many of our members can attest to this.
There is a thread here about being sacked because of OSA -it constitutes unfair dismissal because OSAis a treatable condition.
I agree with you when you say, "I understand completely the need to safeguard our roads - of course I do. We do not need drivers who fall asleep at the wheel."
Whether or not The Powers That Be "need to understand" anything about our lives is a debatabale point - the next set are in power and a few OSA sufferers added to the 2.51 million on Job Seekers might not be high on their agenda.
The family of the guy run down by a sleeping OSA driver might well argue that the DVLA rules need to be much tougher.
I contend that "feeling upset" with the DVLA and expressing those feelings is a very different kettle of fish to your comments on 6th May. I am filled with dread every time I am about to engage with a bureaucracy but find that speaking pleasantly and courteously, listening carefully, asking for help, advice and guidance, thanking them for their time and attention, spending a little time enquiring about their day, eases my way through the minefield. I never engage without a detailed map in front of me, though.
Dave, I'm really enjoying your company! What better beginning than a difference of opinion, rationally discussed? May the gods forbid that we all see the world from the same perspective!
Drewsnoresnomore, I'm so sorry you've fallen foul of sleep clinic instructions about DVLA.
Rule 1. Ignore sleep clinic advice about DVLA
Rule 2. NEVER tell DVLA that you have OSA until you have a confirmed, in writing, diagnosis. At that point, ask DVLA to send you the medical reporting forms. That is the start gun for a race to get onto CPAP treatment so you can honestly say you are being successfully treated when you return the forms.
There is endless info about OSA and DVLA in this forum.
TF
Comment