I am wondering exactly why CPAP machines are prescription-only, when it appears that there are very few contra-indications, and also why it isn't possible for the user to control the settings. Why do the powers that be assume that CPAP users cannot tell for themselves how effective their treatment is being?
Has anyone considered lobbying for machines to be declassified as prescription-only? And if so, how one would go about it?
I ask because my husband has to wait such a long time between visits to his consultant, and if anything does go wrong with his machine he is likely to have to wait a long time to be referred to a technician who can do anything about it. Also, the wait for diagnosis and treatment is incredibly long - he was one of the lucky ones, having private health insurance at the time of diagnosis, which vaastly speeded up the process. If CPAP machines were not prescription only, people could be empowered to look after their own health rather than being totally at the mercy of long waiting lists, and in my husband's case, an unsympathetic and not very knowledgeable consultant.
Any thoughts, anyone?
Has anyone considered lobbying for machines to be declassified as prescription-only? And if so, how one would go about it?
I ask because my husband has to wait such a long time between visits to his consultant, and if anything does go wrong with his machine he is likely to have to wait a long time to be referred to a technician who can do anything about it. Also, the wait for diagnosis and treatment is incredibly long - he was one of the lucky ones, having private health insurance at the time of diagnosis, which vaastly speeded up the process. If CPAP machines were not prescription only, people could be empowered to look after their own health rather than being totally at the mercy of long waiting lists, and in my husband's case, an unsympathetic and not very knowledgeable consultant.
Any thoughts, anyone?
Comment